{:tr}Bridging the gap{:}{:en}Bridging the gap{:}

{:tr}

A brief European basketball leagues comparison (2011-2016)

Introduction

This post is a brief deep dive into the recent history of European basketball leagues ranging from Germany, Spain, Italy, France to Turkey as well as a league such as the Euroleague which is Pan-European. The aim is mainly to pin-point and highlight certain values that have been reached between 2011-2016 across different leagues while comparing how different domestic leagues have done against others in different regards. The reason why a five year span has been made use of is due to the fact that it makes it easier to average out and bring current data and values forward with adequate focus on proper analysis.

The breakdown

As mentioned above, this is a deep dive into historic statistical values that have been recorded and have further been worked up as a part of Advance Pro Basketball’s recent data acquisition.

To explain things further in terms of statistical values point production across Europe has always been a strategic point of impact across various domestic leagues. In Europe a natural balance is present; key defensive values impact the way teams create offense and visa versa. This this point in mind it should be noted that the pace of games across Europe are played at high levels and to a major extent non European players as well as European players alike have a further impact on how point production ends up being of high value. It should not be under estimated that defense is also critical in European basketball overall. Defensive Rating an effective statistic which collectively and initially accounts for player/team impact of defense across leagues has been put to use and an offensive comparison through Offensive Rating along side pace has also been taken into account as can seen below in the initial table. While ideally over the last five years varying leagues namely, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Turkey and the Euroleague have been focal points and have seen top level competition in Mens’ basketball.

As seen in the table there has been a climb in all categories across all the leagues in Spain, Germany, France as well as in Turkey. This has obviously impacted the Euroleague wherein champions as well as contenders at the top of domestic European leagues compete on a weekly basis. With the recent format change in the Euroleague that has increased the number of games seems to have positively impacted the pan-european competition however the domestic leagues have suffered in the process.

Tri-league comparison 

Given the picture across Europe with the initial ORtg, DRtg and Pace it only makes sense to look closer at effective scoring across selective leagues. In this sense the decision to look at the Turkish BSL, German BBL and Italian Serie A leagues which have respectively differing stances in terms of foreign player restrictions, strategic player rotations, coaching strategies and most importantly team/league value ($$ vs. player production).

With the above graphs on the left hand side it becomes evident that while during the 12-13 season in Italy turnovers where at a 5 year high with 18,3% turnovers across the league it should be noted overall that domestic leagues games spanning across a season in Europe usually range on average between 33-35 games. Moreover a 5 year low was hit back in the same season in Turkey with 14,8% turnovers across the league proving that ball possession was critical to teams/players competing in the BSL (then Turkish basketball league). Once more its best to point out that TOV% is a good indicator to effective scoring production especially when it comes to analyzing league and historical values in this kind of setting.

To put a spotlight focus on direct effective scoring production its only sensible to look directly at True Shooting percentages (TS%) as well as effective Field Goal percentages (eFG%) which are both by far the most highly regarded statistics that allow for effective analysis.

As seen in the right hand side of the graph, in terms of TS% the Italian league has seen both peaks of highest and lowest percentages in two (13-14, 15-16) seasons.

On the other hand in terms of eFG% a commentary as follows can be made. The Turkish BSL which underwent a change in increasing its foreign player count for teams was positively impacted in the process. While in the German BBL the stability that had started with the 2010-2011 season which prior dates yet can be seen as a precursor to how overall effective scoring and point production has made the German BBL one of the most of not the most marketable league within this analysis. In terms of the Italian Serie a league which has seen its share of issues on the court with only a hand full of teams being able to make effective use of realistic $$ vs. player production had hit the highest mark by the end of the 2013-2014 season.

Differences of Play

To put a spin on things further, here is a more plain look at how different leagues across 5 years have soared. France where predominantly a fast paced style of play with a median pace within the mid 80s had been hit. On the other end of the spectrum where we see more high volume possessions which effectively mean hihg level of figures with closer to +85 pace figures have been hit in the Turkish BSL prove a clear contrast between the leagues initially. With this in focus we can take a closer look at how basic stats looked like in the past between the French Pro A and BSL leagues.

Conclusion

There is close to enough evidence that overall European basketball has varying styles and strengths of play ranging from high level offense to high level defense. At a glance very simplistically when all aspects considered the Turkish Basketball Super League seems to be the league best adapted to all the current changes and has in the process become the league for players especially foreigners without a doubt. It is still a question to be answered whether the domestic players within the BSL can shine as well as they have in the past and contribute to key wins as the current season continues.{:}{:en}

A brief European basketball leagues comparison (2011-2016)

Introduction

This post is a brief deep dive into the recent history of European basketball leagues ranging from Germany, Spain, Italy, France to Turkey as well as a league such as the Euroleague which is Pan-European. The aim is mainly to pin-point and highlight certain values that have been reached between 2011-2016 across different leagues while comparing how different domestic leagues have done against others in different regards. The reason why a five year span has been made use of is due to the fact that it makes it easier to average out and bring current data and values forward with adequate focus on proper analysis.

The breakdown

As mentioned above, this is a deep dive into historic statistical values that have been recorded and have further been worked up as a part of Advance Pro Basketball’s recent data acquisition.

To explain things further in terms of statistical values point production across Europe has always been a strategic point of impact across various domestic leagues. In Europe a natural balance is present; key defensive values impact the way teams create offense and visa versa. This this point in mind it should be noted that the pace of games across Europe are played at high levels and to a major extent non European players as well as European players alike have a further impact on how point production ends up being of high value. It should not be under estimated that defense is also critical in European basketball overall. Defensive Rating an effective statistic which collectively and initially accounts for player/team impact of defense across leagues has been put to use and an offensive comparison through Offensive Rating along side pace has also been taken into account as can seen below in the initial table. While ideally over the last five years varying leagues namely, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Turkey and the Euroleague have been focal points and have seen top level competition in Mens’ basketball.

As seen in the table there has been a climb in all categories across all the leagues in Spain, Germany, France as well as in Turkey. This has obviously impacted the Euroleague wherein champions as well as contenders at the top of domestic European leagues compete on a weekly basis. With the recent format change in the Euroleague that has increased the number of games seems to have positively impacted the pan-european competition however the domestic leagues have suffered in the process.

Tri-league comparison 

Given the picture across Europe with the initial ORtg, DRtg and Pace it only makes sense to look closer at effective scoring across selective leagues. In this sense the decision to look at the Turkish BSL, German BBL and Italian Serie A leagues which have respectively differing stances in terms of foreign player restrictions, strategic player rotations, coaching strategies and most importantly team/league value ($$ vs. player production).

 

 

With the above graphs on the left hand side it becomes evident that while during the 12-13 season in Italy turnovers where at a 5 year high with 18,3% turnovers across the league it should be noted overall that domestic leagues games spanning across a season in Europe usually range on average between 33-35 games. Moreover a 5 year low was hit back in the same season in Turkey with 14,8% turnovers across the league proving that ball possession was critical to teams/players competing in the BSL (then Turkish basketball league). Once more its best to point out that TOV% is a good indicator to effective scoring production especially when it comes to analyzing league and historical values in this kind of setting.

To put a spotlight focus on direct effective scoring production its only sensible to look directly at True Shooting percentages (TS%) as well as effective Field Goal percentages (eFG%) which are both by far the most highly regarded statistics that allow for effective analysis.

As seen in the right hand side of the graph, in terms of TS% the Italian league has seen both peaks of highest and lowest percentages in two (13-14, 15-16) seasons.

On the other hand in terms of eFG% a commentary as follows can be made. The Turkish BSL which underwent a change in increasing its foreign player count for teams was positively impacted in the process. While in the German BBL the stability that had started with the 2010-2011 season which prior dates yet can be seen as a precursor to how overall effective scoring and point production has made the German BBL one of the most of not the most marketable league within this analysis. In terms of the Italian Serie a league which has seen its share of issues on the court with only a hand full of teams being able to make effective use of realistic $$ vs. player production had hit the highest mark by the end of the 2013-2014 season.

Differences of Play

To put a spin on things further, here is a more plain look at how different leagues across 5 years have soared. France where predominantly a fast paced style of play with a median pace within the mid 80s had been hit. On the other end of the spectrum where we see more high volume possessions which effectively mean hihg level of figures with closer to +85 pace figures have been hit in the Turkish BSL prove a clear contrast between the leagues initially. With this in focus we can take a closer look at how basic stats looked like in the past between the French Pro A and BSL leagues.

 

Conclusion

There is close to enough evidence that overall European basketball has varying styles and strengths of play ranging from high level offense to high level defense. At a glance very simplistically when all aspects considered the Turkish Basketball Super League seems to be the league best adapted to all the current changes and has in the process become the league for players especially foreigners without a doubt. It is still a question to be answered whether the domestic players within the BSL can shine as well as they have in the past and contribute to key wins as the current season continues.{:}

{:tr}Takas takas mı? (Furkan Korkmaz ve Can Maxim Mutaf){:}{:en}Is this trade really a trade? (Furkan Korkmaz & Can Maxim Mutaf){:}

{:tr}Kısa, görsel bir kıyaslama tablosu ile takımlarına olumlu etkide bulunmuş iki kilit Milli takım oyuncumuzun takasıyla kariyerlerinde daha iyi yerlere gelmelerini diliyoruz.

Furkan Korkmaz: 1. tur, 26. sıra’da 76ers tarafından seçilen ve daha fazla sürenin yanısıra oyununu sergileyebilmesi ümit ediliyor.

Can Maxim Mutaf: 2006’dan beri A takım seviyesinde yıldızı parlayan oyuncu olarak bilinen ve Avrupa basketboluna etkisini hissettirmiş bir oyuncudur.

Son söz sizlerin, Banvit ve Anadolu Efes arasındaki bu takas iki taraf için başarılı mı oldu veya oyunculardan birisi için mi daha verimli bir sonuç doğuracak?

{:}{:en}In a brief visual comparison of two key national team players that have had great impact on their teams have switched places and hope to find a better flow and career path.

Furkan Korkmaz: The young talent and 1st round, 26th pick of the 67ers has moved to Banvit so that he might get improved playing time and better exposure.

Can Maxim Mutaf: A shinning talent since 2006 that has been improving his game every year since he has hit the European basketball scene.

You be the judge, was the trade between Banvit and Anadolu Efes a two way success or will it bring one player more than the other?

{:}

{:tr}Eurolig’de Cuma akşamı oynanan iki maç ve istatistiki analizleri{:}{:en}2 games played Friday evening in the Euroleague & their statistical analysis{:}

{:tr}Giriş

Cuma akşamı oynanan ve Türkiye’nin Eurolig temsilcilerinden GOSB ve Fenerbahçe’nin de sahada olduğu akşamda GSOB maalesef ikinci mağlubiyetini alarak şu anda Eurolig’de sonuncu sırada. Fenerbahçe ise heyecanlı bir maç sonunda galip gelmeyi bildi.

Bu yazımda her iki maçın maç analizi ve GameScore (GmSc) istatistiğini dikkate alarak maçların en verimli oyuncuları ve maçda yakaladıkları şut grafiklerini bulabilirsiniz.

Barcelona (72) – Fenerbahçe (73)

Maçın genelinde Fenerbahçe’nin Barcelona’ya üstünlük sağlama sebebi olarak buldukları 11 üçlüğün yanısıra ofansif rating olarak 110.6 gibi kalbur üstü bir değeri maç genelinde oluşan 66 possessionda çıkartmaları ve 17% oranında top kayıbı ile kritik anlarda Barcelona’dan daha iyi top çevirmiş olmaları dikkat çekiyor.

APB Maçın oyuncuları:

Barcelona

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-12-48-27
screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-22-32

  screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-12-48-40

Fenerbahçe

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-12-49-20

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-22-46

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-12-50-59

Galatasaray Odeabank Istanbul (83) – Crvena Zvezda mts Belgrade (85)

GSOB savunmada her ne kadar 72 possessionda 118’lik bir defensive rating (DRtg)’e erişmişse de, 29/63 FGM ile ve TS oranı %56 ile maçta yeteri kadar verimli hücum edemedi. kritik anlarda yaşadıkları top kayıplarına karşı Crvena Zvezda iki takım kıyaslamasında oran olarak daha çok top kaybıyla (%16) oynadı.

APB Maçın oyuncuları:

GSOB

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-26-43

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-28-38

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-26-53

Crvena Zvezda

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-27-03

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-28-50

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-27-15

{:}{:en}Introduction

With Friday evening’s Euroleague games and both GSOB and Fenerbahçe being on the floor while Fenerbahçe won its matchup against Barcelona with a 1 point difference. GSOB lost their second game in a row and are currently at the end of the league table.

This post includes a full game analysis of two games as well as the APB player of the game based on GameScore stats. You can also view the game highlights as well as the shooting charts of the APB players of the game.

Barcelona (72) – Fenerbahçe (73)

Based on the overall game, Fenerbahçe managed to overpower Barcelona due to out scoring them behind the arche with 11 3point shots made, their offensive rating of 110.6 within 66 possessions and 17% of turnovers and passing the ball better than their opponent during critical points in the game.

APB Players of the Game:

Barcelona

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-12-48-27
screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-22-32

  screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-12-48-40

Fenerbahçe

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-12-49-20

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-22-46

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-12-50-59

Galatasaray Odeabank Istanbul (83) – Crvena Zvezda mts Belgrade (85)

GSOB unfortunately lost their second game in a row and while had a high defensive rating of 118 within 72 possessions they only managed to record 29/63 FGM and only recorded a 56% True shooting percentage. They turned the ball over at critical possessions during the game and while Crvena Zvezda had a higher TOV% of 16%.

APB Players of the Game:

GSOB

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-26-43

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-28-38

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-26-53

Crvena Zvezda

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-27-03

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-28-50

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-13-27-15

{:}